Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Tom Berger wrote:
>
> > Vincent Danen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Traci Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Now you see why I, after two years, I only use three partitions: swap, / and
> > > > > /home. Swap is obvious. /home is where I store downloads and files I want
>to
> > > > > keep. Everything else goes in /. When it's time to upgrade, I only format
>and
> > > > > fresh reinstall in /. It's clean. It's efficient and I always have the
>right
> > > > > size partitions :-)
> > > >
> > > > That makes a certain amount of sense, so, what is the magic number in
> > > > /? I was basicly trying do something similar by giving / it's own
> > > > partition. I set it for 100mb because Redhat suggested 50-80mb and I
> > > > wanted to be conservative. Obviously, the definition of a
> > > > conservative is changing but I am curious as to how big it needs to
> > > > be?
> > >
> > > You're looking at it the wrong way, Traci... you need to decide how big
> > > you want /home to be... that's the question you need to ask. Once you've
> > > decided that (and how big your swap is going to be) give *everything* else
> > > to root...
> > >
> > > For example, on my system I have:
> > >
> > > swap - 70MB
> > > /home - 2GB
> > > / - 11GB
> > >
> > > Why? Well, this gives 2GB for user files and downloads and whatnot.. more
> > > than enough I think. The other 11GB goes on root... if you don't
> > > specifically make a /var, or /usr or any other partition for a directory
> > > off the root directory, it all becomes a part of the / partition... make
> > > sense? For example, that 11GB is being shared by /var, /etc, /usr, /sbin,
> > > and so forth. That way I don't have to worry about how much to give /var,
> > > of if I've given /sbin too much, or any other problem associated with
> > > defining limits for directories. I always found that silly, tried it
> > > once, and it pissed me off so much I reinstalled just to make (to me) a
> > > *proper* directory structure (which is swap, /home, and / and that's it).
> > >
> > > Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ: 16978834
> > > BBBS/LiI . Internet Rex for Linux Beta
> > > Stronghold Enterprises/X BBS . http://shx.tzo.net
> > > Telnet://shx.tzo.net . Weblogin-http://shx.tzo.net/shx
> >
> >
> > Though I can see your point, using more partitions has an advantage in the case
> > of drive corruption.
> > Usually / should be very small to minimize this danger by reducing the number of
> > accesses to it. If your partition becomes corrupted somewhere in /usr you're
> > lost. With a distinct root partition you still have a chance to save yourself
> > and since there is a tool like Partition Magic (and soon our own DiskDrake), I'd
> > still tend to suggest using multiple partitions.
> >
> > My table:
> > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/hda3 76M 24M 48M 33% /
> > /dev/hda8 486M 149M 311M 32% /home
> > /dev/hda10 99M 2.8M 91M 3% /tmp
>
> Thats one way to stop people from flooding /tmp to fill your drives :)
>
*grin*. Well, I just don't want to have a world-writable directory on my /. I
know I could symlink it to /var - hum - maybe next time ;). With drives this big
it doesn't really matter.
tom
> > /dev/hda11 1.9G 1.0G 813M 57% /usr
> > /dev/hda9 152M 12M 132M 8% /var
> >
> > You see, no probs whatsoever ;-)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > tom
> >
> >
>
> --
> MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
> --Axalon
--
"Never trust a Shoggoth!"
Thomas 'tom' Berger, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LSTB - "advancing the community"
