Denis Havlik wrote:
>
> Hi, Salim
>
> :>I suggest that Mandrake starts referring people to OpenSSH rather than SSH
> :>1.2.x. What do you all think?
>
> I had no time to "play" with OpenSSH so far. I need some clearup on this
> issue. Here are the questions:
>
> 1) AFAIK, OpenSSH is based on an older ssh 1.2.x version (YES/NO)
> 2) Are there any differences in use and configuration of OpenSSH as
> compared to "standard" ssh? That is, is it a drop-in replacement for ssh,
> and if no, what are the differences?
> 3) Does OpenSSH also come with "ssh-agent"?
> 4) Is it ready for a heavy-duty use, or should I wait a little longer
> before using it in production enviroment?
>
> I suppose, if your answers are YNYY, there is no need to use the
> "standard" ssh anymore. By the way, I would love to hear from some
> GPG-users, too - If I am going to switch to OpenSSH, I could wipe-out PGP
> during the process, too...
>
> cu
> Denis
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Denis Havlik ||| http://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
> (@ @) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------------------
Haven't tried OpenSSH yet, but GPG is pretty much drop-in. I use it with
TkPGP and a PGP keyring, no problems.
Jack
--
Linux: because you can't do a sig like this in Windows.
3:25pm up 17 days, 22:08, 2 users, load average: 0.05, 0.04, 0.06
