"Brash, Matthew" wrote: > > Supposedly defragging is unnessecary in Linux. The Ext2 file system doesn't > get fragmented or something. Can anyone confirm/trash this idea? I wrote a few days ago about this: Ext2 filesystem does an excellent job of limiting---not eliminating---fragmentation. A defrag program does exist. Seems it was written for the first extended filesystem---which, BTW, had a harder time with fragmentation. The performance gains after running defrag on an ext2 do not seem (on average) to be that great. Lots more useful info is available at the links below. The second link is the source for defrag which contains an interesting README comparing bootup times before and after running defrag. http://web.mit.edu/tytso/www/linux/ext2.html ftp://tsx-11.mit.edu/pub/linux/packages/ext2fs/defrag-0.70.tar.gz ---Norvell Spearman
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK Michael Holt
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK Monte Milanuk
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK Piero
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK John Aldrich
- [expert] Filesystems Primer Or why we d... Civileme
- Re: [expert] Filesystems Primer Or ... Joseph S. Gardner
- RE: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK Eric Peters
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK Thompsson
- RE: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK McDonald, John GSM1 (SIMASD)
- RE: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK Brash, Matthew
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK Norvell Spearman
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK Civileme
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in ... Cokey de Percin
- Re: [expert] Defrag counterpart in ... Charles Curley
- RE: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK McDonald, John GSM1 (SIMASD)
- RE: [expert] Defrag counterpart in MDK McDonald, John GSM1 (SIMASD)