Asheesh Laroia wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Ron Johnson, Jr. wrote:
>
> > HOWEVER, in the commercial realm, when dozens of clerks are
> > logged into a system, it is often useful (for tracking, auditing
> > or consistency, etc.) to only let a clerk log into a system once.
>
> But if I wanted to wreak havoc on the tracking system, I'd just open about
> 11 bash shells, scores of rxvts, and a few instances of Netscape. That
> way, I'd have lots of possible input methods on a *single* login.
>
> Put simply, I don't think the concept of a single login really exists in
> Linux Mandrake.
>
> Best regards, though. Anyone with more constructive suggestions, feel
> free to prove me wrong!
>
> -- Asheesh Laroia.
I agree with u; I was simply pointing out a circumstance where
single-login is useful...
Would it be easier, if not foolproof, to enforce single-login
on dumb serial terminals?
Ron
--
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Jefferson, LA USA WWW : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| |
| Most overused words: feel, cool/kewl, fun, myBlah.com |
| Most underused word: think |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
