I am wondering how much speed you gain installing i686 instead of i586
packages.  I now my AMD-K6-2 500Mhz refuses to run i686 packages but i586
work fine for me (when I do uname -a linux tells me I run a i586 and rpm is
smart enough to deny installation of any i686.rpm).   So maybe i686 packages
only work on certain systems. If you gain a lot of speed from your i686 it
is woth the trouble but if it is only a few percent maybe it is a good idea
to stick with i586 packages.  Maybe those "invalid character 45"  errors you
got are causing all the trouble.

>From all my experiments with linux I learned one thing:  Playing with glibc
= playing with fire (since a lot of application are using glibc).  But if
you fixed your problem I am still intrested to hear from you what it was.

Marcus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Piety" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] giving up (for now) compiling packages


> Praedor Tempus wrote:
>
> > OK, I am tired of a near unusable system because of the problems
> > building packages on Mandrake 7.2beta so I am going with i586.rpms,
> > except for those that I KNOW built properly for i686.
> >
> > I have replaced my glibc build - it built, but with a bunch of
> > "invalid character 45" errors that make me a bit nervous about
> > the integrity of the resultant i686.rpms.  I have replaced a
> > lot of things with the i586.rpms.  One thing that I cannot
> > get to work, no matter what, is the menu package.  It installs
> > fine (menu-2.1.5-28mdk OR menu-2.1.5-30mdk) but crash bigtime
> > whenever "update-menus" is called.
> >
> > EVERY time something tries to make use of "update-menus" upon
> > install results in segfault (core dump).  Every time.  It did
> > this with the src build I compiled.  It does it with each
> > binary rpm I try.
> >
> > Does anyone have a functional 7.2beta menu rpm?
> >
> > I have gone back and made sure to RE-install the other rpms
> > that are listed as dependencies for menu to no avail.
> > It doesn't work.
> >
> > praedor
> >
> > Don't envy the loops you've been jumping thru with this. There was a
'bug'
> > of a
>
> sort in glibc-2.1.3 concerning 'invalid character 45' errors and, for
> example, 'full-config-sysdirs'.  Essentially, each instance needed to be
> converted to full_config_sysdirs. Do you have the offending output? There
was
> a patch out for glibc specifically directed
> toward the invalid character 45 problem.
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
>


Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

Reply via email to