Hello, It's some times not so good having the latest compilers... I don't speak of gcc-2.96 that I can't understand why RedHat and Mandrake have taken a gcc 2.96 (see http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-2.96.html for the way gcc people thinks about that...). Now I have tried 2.96 and I have to say, it was everything but good ;-(( Now I want to go back to 2.95.2 and I said no problem, I have just to grab the rpm and install them... well yes and no: for example, gcc -v now give me: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-mandrake-linux/2.95.3/specs gcc version 2.95.3 19991030 (prerelease) Is there any explaination for doing such thinks (I mean naming things with different names)? I don't find one ;-( What's is the last rpm with the right things in it? I need a true 2.95.2, because I have to compile DVB stuff from www.linuxtv.org I have nothing against 2.95.3 or 2.96 as long as the names are right... Please CC to me any reply (If there are some): I am not on the list ;-) Thanks you very much, Greg ________________________________________________________________ http://ulima.unil.ch/greg ICQ:16624071 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
