-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 23:43, Expert wrote:
> One must remember, age is irrelevant, one's own skill level and
> handicap (if applicable) is what is to be considered.
Besides, why use a tarball, if you can get an RPM? If you
don't want to use the package manager *when possible*, use
Rock Linux. It *only* uses tarballs.
> On Wednesday 18 July 2001 11:11 pm, so spoke Brandon Caudle:
> > Come on, I'm a 15 year old kid here who just installed 2.2.1 from
> > the gz file, your on the expert list why need rpm? you can
> > customize the package.
> >
> > ~Brandon
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Rankin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "mandrake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:57 PM
> > Subject: [expert] Who's Building Samba 2.2.1a for Mandrake?
> >
> > > Who's Building the Samba 2.2.1a RPM for Mandrake? Samba.org and
> > > rpmfind.net still have 2.2.0. And depressingly enough, the 2.2.0
> > > rpm is built for i686. I'm not adverse to building my own from
> > > the SRPM, but if someone is going to the trouble to build the
> > > rpm, please do so with for both i586 and i686 so we don't have to
> > > go through the discussion regarding alienating all the AMD K6-2
> > > users all over the world -- again.
> > >
> > > I always prefer a Mandrake rpm over a Redhat rpm any day. Takes
> > > some of the guess work out of where the pieces will end up after
> > > install.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
> > > ASEL -- Instrument
> > > Nacogdoches, Texas
> > > N31 34.7 W094 42.6
> > > 355 MSL
- --
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org |
| |
| "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms [of |
| government] those entrusted with power have, in time, and |
| by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny." |
| Thomas Jefferson |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7VpAsjTz5dS9Us5wRAi1XAJ4kdjOenJOA3e3h4KP/bt563AYD2ACeMFpG
iTjoIZjLRSfd68pyP6dIkUQ=
=ymSU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
