On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 07:20, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 23:18, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 21:16, Jack Coates wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 20:43, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > I do this with VNC all the time.  My desktop runs tight vnc but only
> > > > inits to run level 3 ... then from work etc I can get into it no
> > > > problem.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > PS rfbdrake and Remote Desktop Connection both provide access this way
> > > > ... and it's a heck of a lot less bandwidth hungry than normal X.
> > > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > ooh boy, a religious war! heh-heh :-) Actually VNC does use less
> > > bandwidth, but X is still more responsive for me, even over relatively
> > > low-bandwidth high-latency links, because X isn't doing the screen
> > > scrape and poll-my-mouse crud. Now if you're using a pixmapped theme and
> > > the pixmaps are all on the other end of a modem...
> > 
> > Of course a religious war.  Whatdya expect form an old alterboy!
> > *grin*.  The reasons you don't like VNC is why IMHO MDK had the wisdom
> > to switch to tightVNC.  It doesn't do the poll-my-mouse crud (The
> > concept is the mouse is on the local box why draw it twice. So they use
> > a 1x1px spot on the screen at the tip of your local mouse.  I've used it
> > over a 56k connection with iceWM as the wm and it was a bit clunky but
> > faster than pcNowhere on Broadband and screen updates paints and lauches
> > where much faster.  
> > 
> > James
> 
> does the Windows port of VNC support this? I've only used VNC to view
> Windows boxen from Linux, and it's always godawful, even over a LAN. I
> can't use my Linux programs while I'm using vncviewer because any
> overlap of windows causes the whole VNC session to repaint itself for 90
> seconds.

If by this you mean tightVNC yes there is a windows setup for it.  Both
Server and client are available.  In fact in many ways it's a better UI
than the Linux version.  Only thing I've found is that like all windwoze
apps it tend to be a bit more ram intensive.
> 
> rdesktop is a lot better, if the remote machine is W2K and has
> Citrix^H^H^H^H^H^HTerminal Services installed.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to