On Thu Mar 06, 2003 at 10:57:45PM +1300, Michael Adams wrote: > Whups, i should finish reading the posts before replying. Sorry Vincent.
Apparently I suffer from the same symptoms. =) See my reply to your reply. > On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 08:26, Vincent Danen wrote: > > On Tue Mar 04, 2003 at 10:52:18PM -0500, Jim Hubbard wrote: > > > I think that now is a really good time for Mandrake to reconsider their > <snip> > > > will happen I think in about a year when dead versions start piling up. > > > > Corporate Server 2.1 was just announced, and it has a 3 year life policy. > > It's also cheaper than RHAS I believe. There is your choice. Supporting > > 9.1 for 3 years isn't an option. Mandrake Linux 9.1 is a desktop OS and > > while it works quite nicely on servers, that is not it's intended (read: > > support from us) function. > > > <snip> -- MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/ Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/ "lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import" {FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
