Am Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2003 21:07 schrieb Vox: > On September 1993 plus 3563 days Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 Jun 2003 11:49 am, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Unless you are planning on doing something with that video you are > getting into your computer (ie. record, edit, export), you don't > need a good video capture card...any bttv based 20 bucks card will > let you watch TV in your computer without problems. I have a > TreeView99 card here, and it worked great for over a year (I finally > fell into temptation and got a real TV, so I'm not using the card > anymore...tho it's still in the computer and worked last time I used > it :) > > Vox You are absolutly right. I would take it another way: If you live in europe and you have a sat dish that is able to receive digital, you have to think about a dvb-card. For cable and terristrial there are rare cases where you would like to have such a card (like in Berlin, germany where analog terrestrial will be switched off in near future (or is?)) On sat a nova+dxr3 or a premium TT card is worth the money (50+ mp2 (192-224 kbit) radiostations and the same for tv-station, hmmm its more I have nearby 300 stations in my channels.conf, further you have timeshift easy recording in great quality etc pp) , but dvb != analog and for the 20-30 programms (often only 10) i don't know if dvb-t is worth the money. If you have cable, you would need dvb-c and dvb-c is again incompatible with sky-tv. So if you want to have a DVR-machine dvb is great, for just a tv-card the nova-t is completly wrong and to expensive (even if the nova is cheaper then the big brother, the nexus(200¤ minimum). Steffen
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
