On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 23:29, SainTiss wrote:
> Ok, anyway, I've tried to change the IP addresses now so that they are
> in different subnets, but that doesn't really seem to help... pinging
> between the 2 client pc's doesn't even work anymore now...
>
> This is the config:
>
> gateway (192.168.0.1 and 192.168.1.1):
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth2
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth1
> 213.118.248.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
> lo
> 0.0.0.0 213.118.248.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
>
> client 192.168.0.2:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
> lo
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
>
the gateway address should be the address of the router on both machines
> client 192.168.1.2:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
> lo
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
> 192.168.0.1
> I'd think this is supposed to work, no?
>
> Any ideas as to what is wrong with this setup?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hans
>
>
> On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 21:59, Steven Broos wrote:
> > Quick lesson in subnetworking, because I think the problem isn't your
> > IPtables-settings but your network layout.
> >
> > 192.168.0.x is a class C network address. 192.168.0 is the network
> > address, and the last number is the host-portion of the address.
> > If all PCs have an address beginning with 192.168.0 and a netmask of
> > 255.255.255.0 they are on the same subnet, and don't need routing.
> > If you need to separate your LAN into difefrent subnets, use 192.168.0.x
> > and 192.168.1.x etc...
> >
> > Creating a subnet with mask 255.255.255.255 isn't possible, because that
> > way you don't have any broadcast/network-addresses.
> >
> > If you think this goes into the right direction, please give more
> > details about your LAN and ask for more information :-)
> >
> > regards,
> > Steven
> > (CCNA)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 20:47, SainTiss wrote:
> > > Well, what I *need* e.g. on the gateway is something like this:
> > >
> > > Kernel IP routing table
> > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> > > Iface
> > > 192.168.0.3 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
> > > eth2
> > > 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
> > > eth1
> > > 213.118.248.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
> > > eth0
> > > 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
> > > lo
> > > 0.0.0.0 213.118.248.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> > > eth0
> > >
> > > However, by default those upper 2 rules aren't there, and instead
> > > there's a rule like this:
> > >
> > > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> > > 0 eth2
> > >
> > > So in other words, by default ALL LAN traffic is routed through eth2,
> > > while obviously traffic with 192.168.0.2 should be routed via eth1.
> > >
> > > Did that make it any clearer?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 20:18, Bill Mullen wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, SainTiss wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I just changed my network configs here, and it seems the routing table
> > > > > got messed up...
> > > > >
> > > > > I know the solution (ie adding some rules and deleting some), but I was
> > > > > wondering if there was some file or something where I could specify the
> > > > > right rules, so that the table is setup correctly at boot?
> > > > >
> > > > > what's the default way to do this? I'm guessing some file which is then
> > > > > processed by ifup or something, but I'm not sure...
> > > >
> > > > Depends on what's messed up. :)
> > > >
> > > > Most settings draw on the information in the "/etc/sysconfig" directory,
> > > > specifically the "network" file and the various "ifcfg-<interface>" ones
> > > > in the "network-scripts" subdirectory. For simpler setups, these are all
> > > > you'll need to adjust, but we have no idea how complicated your normal
> > > > routing table actually is ... care to offer a hint? ;)
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
--
richard bown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
