Charles A Edwards wrote:

On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 11:38:19 -0400
"Albert E. Whale, CISSP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



what am I missing here?



Sounds like you have may have Sources other than for 9.1 defined.



Charles




No, I don't have non 9.1 Sources listed. Besides the Installation CDs, here are my other source definitions:

update_source ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandrake/updates/9.1/RPMS {
hdlist: hdlist.update_source.cz
with_hdlist: ../base/hdlist.cz
update
}


contrib_mandrake.mirrors.pair.com_i586_9.1 ftp://mandrake.mirrors.pair.com/mandrake/iso/../9.1/contrib/RPMS {
hdlist: hdlist.contrib_mandrake.mirrors.pair.com_i586_9.1.cz
with_hdlist: ../../i586/Mandrake/base/hdlist2.cz
}


distrib_mirrors.secsup.org_i586_9.1 ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandrake/iso/../9.1/i586/Mandrake/RPMS {
hdlist: hdlist.distrib_mirrors.secsup.org_i586_9.1.cz
with_hdlist: ../base/hdlist.cz
}


Besides that, the original Error was about the following:

The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
bind-9.2.2-1mdk (due to conflicts with bind)
caching-nameserver-9.0-2mdk (due to unsatisfied bind >= 9.2.0-0.a3.2mdk)

I still think that this is a Problem with the recognition of Versioning within URPMI. Not my selected Sources for URPMI.

Anyone else care to comment? I think that the improvements in urpmi are Great, but I also think that there is another problem which needs to be resolved here.


--
Albert E. Whale, CISSP - Sr. Security, Network, and Systems Consultant
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.abs-comptech.com & http://www.No-JunkMail.com ABS Computer Technology, Inc. - ESM, Computer & Networking Specialists
No-JunkMail.com - SPAM Stops Here.
Founding Board of Directors of Pittsburgh FBI - InfraGard





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to