On 11/1/06, Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/1/06, Peter Finley wrote:
> If [1] and/or [2], how much sense does it have to keep JPEG around > _all the time_? If photos could be processed non-destructively and > shown in processed form in F-Spot, would you still want having JPEG > around or would you be happy with possibility to easily export > processed originals with required settings (print/web) on demand? > > Maybe it's about time to hear from all F-Spot users who shoot to RAW > what workflow is ideal for them? > > Alexandre Well I shoot RAW + JPG all the time, and I do keep both files. If I need to send a lot of files to somebody, or post to the web, I use the JPG:s. If I want to do more work on some specific pictures, or if the pictures need more editing I work with the RAW:s. For me it is important to keep botf files handy, if I need to send out 100 JPG:s, I will not have the time to wait for 100 pistures to be prosessed to JPG:s. I have too big archive, and too slow computer, so I an trying to keep things simple. This on-demand prosessing will work fine for people who do not need very meny pictures in JPG form very often. _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list F-spot-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
