Hi, Is there any ongoing work for supporting color profiles in f-spot? I'm aware there's some code in src/Imaging/, but I already learned it does "not enough". Things I'd like to see: - support for embedded color (ICC) profiles as per JFIF or Exif 2.2 and for files using AdobeRGB as per Exif 2.21/DCF 2.0 when viewing files. - conversion from the profiles named above to sRGB when exporting (optional, so you can use sRGB for web galleries, photo sharing sites etc and the native color space of the file whenever needed).
This obviously does not result in a "color managed workflow" but will help dealing with color profiled images. I'm willing to help coding and testing, but I did not want to duplicate work already done. Can someone of the developers tell me which parts of the color profile code is working? Below I have compiled some points about color profiles and file formats, in random order, for those who didn't already dive into the gory details (sorry, it's a little lengthy): - Do not expect to get a "color managed workflow" and such by just having those profile thingies around. - The two most important color spaces today are sRGB and AdobeRGB. The former was supposed to be a "good guess" for most monitors (roughly speaking) when it was designed, the latter was designed by Adobe as enhanced "working color space" for preprint stages. It has a somewhat better color reproduction in cyan and green areas. - A lot of software does not handle color profiles, but just assumes sRGB on all images. This includes all major web browsers except Apple Safari (and perhaps the upcoming Firefox 3) and even a lot of image viewers (gqview-devel 2.1.5 does support embedded profiles, but not Exif 2.21 as explained below; additionally, gqview development seems dormant). Gimp 2.4 supports color profiles, but not Exif 2.21. For this reason images to be posted on the web should be in sRGB color space. - If files recorded in AdobeRGB are viewed as sRGB files (without conversion), colors look very dull and grey. - Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as a "JPEG file". Today, whe have JFIF (JPEG File Interchange Format) and Exif (Exchangeable Image File Format). The former does always and the latter does often carry their "payload" (the image) as JPEG compressed data. According to the papers, they require slightly different metadata handling (almost(?) every application does handle both file types just fine transparently to the user). - if a (newer than 2003) camera records in AdobeRGB, it will hopefully do so in compliance with Exif 2.21/DCF 2.0. Exif 2.21 is an update to the widely known and used Exif 2.2 standard. The most important part of the update (at least for this case) is the support for color spaces besides sRGB and "uncalibrated". So, if the Exif version of an photo file is 2.21 (0x0221 in tag 0x9000 ExifVersion in APP1), it may have an color space of "uncalibrated" (0xFFFF in tag 0xA001 ColorSpace in APP1 (Exif)) and the string "R03" in Exif.Iop.InteropIndex (that's tag 0x001 in the APP1 section), which marks it as a "DCF option file" with AdobeRGB color space. An sRGB file has 0x0001 in ColorSpace and "R98" in InteroperabilityIndex) and is called a "DCF normal file". Also, a "DCF option file" is supposed to have an underscore as the first character of it's file name (for example "_mg_1234.jpg" when using Canon gear). The string "R03" is not defined in Exif 2.2 but only in Exif 2.21. - Some software indicated the use of AdobeRGB on Exif 2.2 files by putting 0x0002 into Exif.Photo.ColorSpace. This is not covered by the standard, and (hopefully) not to common. The "right way" to indicate color profiles besides sRGB in Exif 2.2 is to set Exif.Photo.ColorSpace to "uncalibrated" and supply the profile in Exif.Photo.ICC_Profile (the profile itself is stored in an APP2 section). - Files created by other software (Gimp, Photoshop) will be in JFIF format can carry an embedded profile in an APP2 section, but there are no "real Exif tags". - For correctly interpreting "DCF option files" with AdobeRGB color space one needs to have the AdobeRGB profile around. You can download these at http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/adobergb.html but I think their license is too tight for including the profile in open source software. Alternatives are using a homebrewed profile "compatible with Adobe RGB (1998)" (I think I've seen one in src/Imaging/Tiff.cs) or instructing the user to download a profile on his own. There have been suggestions from the OpenICC project to put color profiles in /usr/share/color/icc/, /usr/local/share/color/icc/ or ~/.color/icc/. - Some reading: the exiftool documentation http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ the Exif 2.2 standard http://www.exif.org/specifications.html a tutorial on color management basics http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/color-management1.htm the most comprehensive freely available official source on Exif 2.21/DCF 2.0 (no joking here) http://www.cipa.jp/exifprint/contents_e/01exif2_2_e.html Regards Christoph -- Spare Space _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
