On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Michael Lissner <[email protected]> wrote: > This isn't entirely fair just to dismiss all of these out of hand. I too > like F-spot because of its simplicity, but if useful new tools could be > added to it in such a way as to be unobtrusive while adding > functionality, that seems like a good thing to me.
Yes, I agree, as plugins. Many of those mockups have a valid functionality disguised by lots of eyecandy. Things like mosaic creation, print layouts, and domain-specific edition tools (like facial touch-ups) would be great plugins, but they are too narrow in usage to be included in the main program (they would quickly become bloat). IMO, if added, they should follow the GUI conventions of the host program (F-Spot), and not look like an application within an application. > Michael Lissner > [email protected] > 909-576-4123 > > > Frank de Lange wrote on 11/23/2009 02:04 AM: >> On 11/23/2009 09:03 AM, Paul Wellner Bou wrote: >>> I personally don't like those "very good ideas" for F-Spot. >>> >>> Fred wrote: >>>> (loads of whiz-bang flipping-window-crazy-button screens) >> >> May I add a me-to? Those 'very good ideas' look like they'd turn >> f-spot into something which I would not want to use. As to why I do >> use it currently: >> >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=8367209&postcount=12 >> >> Cheers//Frank >> _______________________________________________ >> F-spot-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list > _______________________________________________ > F-spot-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list > -- -Michael Wayne Goodman _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
