Hi, AFAIR, this is my first post to the list, so I'd like to say hello.
Among other things, the goals [1] say something like this: [1] http://f-spot.org/Goals "These and more advanced users are encouraged by F-Spot to grow their skills, to the point where they integrate more specialized photo manipulation software into their F-Spot workflow." May I ask for a bit of clarification of this sentence? Does it mean integrated (internally, tightly, directly) RAW workflow is not considered as one of F-Spot goals? Does it mean there is no place for RAW processing algorithms and tools in F-Spot, thus F-Spot will by design delegate such functionality to external tools? I have used digiKam for long time. I like its feature richness, though I suffer when I have to use user-unfriendly and bloated UI of digiKam. Thus, I rather "Open in UFRaw" from digiKam than hit digiKam's F4 to edit in the built-in tools. However, I like the idea of built-in RAW processors very much, especially if well integrated with photo organiser features. The integration point is quite important here. F-Spot looks like a great potential alternative to digiKam - clean, user-friendly and pleasant to use. Does it fit to the idea of F-Spot at all? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org _______________________________________________ f-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
