Hmmmm. A logical reason. . . Now, please note that I wrote the MAC/CRB in favor of this change. And know nothing of the BOD's reasons.
But. . . Aside from the one style of "puck canister", currently (only?) used on the. . . NovaKar? Tie rod goes through the center of the puck, contained in a cylinder, washers (of variable size?) on either side of the puck control (Somewhat? Differently?) rebound and compression (?). Aside from this one design, this change will cost other canister design users. . . what? A thousand bucks a set all around? That's what it would cost me, and my guy works cheap. Consider two or three sets to test different designs? Don't get me wrong - I am in favor of this. But we ARE talking some serious money here. Yes, for those that choose to pursue it. . . Chris Eckles Atlanta >> If there is a logical reason . . . I think we are "all ears". We're just asking for an explanation and waiting, waiting, waiting . . . << ________________________________ FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500 The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003 _________________________________ _______________________________________________ F500 mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change options please visit: http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500 *** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***
