Eduardo, Sometimes we /do/ want to USE: internals vocabularies. Eg, sequence combinators like 'each' use the sequence-internals vocabulary words such as nth-unsafe.
Slava On 6-Jan-07, at 7:56 AM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote: > Hello, > > Erg and others expressed concern about using internals vocabularies > with a > libs/vocabs scheme. This concern came about because I originally > was talking > about having one file correspond to one vocabulary. Now that I've > hammered > out libs/vocabs, it's clear that you can still create many > vocabularies with > a single file. > > USE: foo > > may find libs/foo.factor. foo.factor itself have IN: foo as well as > IN: > foo-internals. So you wouldn't be able to do USE: foo-internals and > have the > system pick up the right file, but that's OK, especially in this > case of it > being an internals vocabulary. > > Ed > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
