> Is there something wrong with simply doing this:
>
> "foo" words [ forget ] each
>
> when foo is reloaded?
Hmmm. So I'm trying this out and noticing that this isn't enough.
--------------------foo.factor----------------------------------------
IN: foo
: a 10 ;
: b 20 ;
: c 30 ;
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------bar.factor----------------------------------------
USE: foo
IN: bar
: aa a ;
: bb b ;
: cc c ;
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"foo.factor" run-file "bar.factor" run-file
Now if I change a:
: a 1 ;
And run-file on foo.factor, aa in bar get's recompiled. Nice. But if I do
my "forget" trick, aa doesn't get see the new definition. So now I'm trying
this. If I want to load foo, I do:
"foo" words ! get the words
dup ! save a copy
[ usage ] map ! see who uses the words in foo (words in bar
in this case)
swap ! get back the "foo" words
[ forget ] each ! forget em
"foo.factor" run-file ! now reload the file
concat [ reload ] each ! reload all the words use the "foo" words
The last line should actually do something like get a list of files that the
dependent words come from, do a 'uniq' on that list and then reload those
files.
Maybe I should try your marking words idea...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
