On 31-Mar-07, at 2:04 AM, Elie CHAFTARI wrote: > I have already removed the oracle- prefix. The binding still lacks any > statement handling (most of it is hard-coded) and this will be the > next > thing I'll tackle.
By statement handling, I assume you mean something like Java's PreparedStatement? > This early success also encourages me towards experimenting with a > direct > OpenSSL binding and eventually an OpenLDAP binding both for SSL and > ASN.1 > needs. That would be great. > I'll follow the recommended module bundling I saw in the > documentation and > complete the binding before submission. Looking forward to it. Now that we have bindings for MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQLite, and ODBC, it would be nice if somebody could develop an abstraction layer, like JDBC. And the libs/tupledb O/R mapper, which right now is sitting on top of SQLite, should be rewritten to use this abstraction layer. Slava ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
