Hi, You can do
[ swap ] swap compose On 10-Oct-07, at 7:40 PM, Samuel Tardieu wrote: > On a related topic, would the following be efficient? > > : curry* ( param obj quot -- obj curry ) > rot [ , \ swap , % ] [ ] make ; inline Well, it's not inefficient because it calls optimized sequence words, but the optimizing compiler is not able to infer the stack effect that would result from calling this quotation. In most cases it is not necessary to write code which constructs quotations at all. Chances are you can simplify your stack effect and express what you need using built-in combinators. What are you coding? Slava > > Sam > -- > Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/ > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a > browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
