On Apr 4, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote: > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Slava Pestov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> By 'very slow' do you mean it times out? It doesn't support HTTP/1.1 >> properly yet. > > I wasn't seeing timeouts a few days ago (just ~10 second response > times that should have been subsecond) -- but yes, in the latest head > it is timing out.
I'm not sure how the ~10 second response times could be explained. How big were the files you were downloading? Perhaps once I fix the timeout issue you can give it another whirl. >> A fix will be made as soon as inheritance stabilizes. > > That's great. No hurry, I just didn't know if it was a known issue. > > While I'm here: IIRC you had once written that Factor's I/O was > generally "slow", and I think it was the reason you weren't yet > participating in the Shootout. I don't remember what specifically was > slow, just your general statement. Would you still characterize Factor > that way? Factor's I/O was pretty fast at one point but the recent addition of I/ O encoding support has slowed things down again. Nothing too drastic though. I will revisit performance soon. In any case, this is only an issue when reading and writing very large files and such (like some of the benchmarks in the shootout) so it's not related to overly-long response times on socket code. That must be another issue. Slava ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
