FWIW I think it would be unfortunate if Factor didn't work on 10.4. I use a "Pismo" PowerBook (i.e. G3) for learning languages and developing web applications; it's a great little machine, but it will never run Leopard.
Also (and more importantly), in terms of distributing OS X applications developed in Factor, it'd be nice not to have to say "sorry, this only runs on Leopard." In fact, I'd say it would be essential. Couldn't it be kept around for a bit longer? I understand that the codebase would be cleaner and neater without it, but to me it seems like too high a price to pay. Of course I'm just an interested observer at this point, so I don't know exactly what the costs and benefits are. This is just my 10 cents' worth (sorry, that's the smallest unit of currency here in NZ). If you needed a 10.4 build machine, I could set up my G4 (all 867MHz of it - the minimum spec for Leopard but fine for Tiger) and you could use that. Cheers, John :^P Slava Pestov wrote: > Daniel Ehrenberg is planning on writing an Objective C 2.0 > binding, and once this is done I don't want to keep the > old Objective C bridge around anymore. At this point, we > will drop 10.4 support. -- John Pallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
