Crest da Zoltral wrote:
> I implemented && || with variable artiy a while ago passing the artiy
> to && and || altought i called them differently.
>
> 10 { [ even? ] [ 10 = ] [ 20 < ] } 1&&
>
> would be
>
> 10 { [ even? ] [ 10 = ] [ 20 < ] } unary all?
>
> if anybody is interessted i will publish the code as soon as i cleaned
> it up.
Nice!
I was thinking about a similar approach, except somehow using 'with'. Of
course, 'with' would have to be enhanced to work with sequences (of
quotations) as well as with quotations. I haven't checked if this is
feasible.
Yet another approach is the "smart combinator" way. I.e. have a general '&&'
which would use 'infer' to figure out the arity. I think the plan is to
explore these kinds of combinators eventually. It seems that for && and ||,
smart versions would be pretty straightforward.
Slava, what do you think? Would smart versions be OK to use here?
Ed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
