Eduardo Cavazos wrote: > Also, || and && might be doable as "smart combinators" and I believe Crest > even coded up an implementation. So how do you feel about using smart > versions of these instead of the arity variants? I believe you once mentioned > that the problem you see is that they'll only work with quotations which are > inferable. So do you think we should be conservative and stick with the ones > we have now? >
Does making the arity explicit help code readability? I find it easy to follow multi-arty cleaves because the arity is explicit in the word. -Phil ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
