On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Eduardo Cavazos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since we're already in the deep end of the character overloading pool, you > might as well consider overloading '[' here. The per slot key overhead would > drop to 6 if you used them here:
The KLF need to realize that TUPLE:'s aren't very common per file. So the saving of 4 keystrokes here and there per slot for something that appears only a few times seems not that great. But if you use a different syntax overloading, or a syntax completely different from anything else, then the fact that TUPLE: usage does not pop up a lot (compared to word definitions for example) means the overhead of remembering what that special syntax is seems to be more of a burden. :-) Chris. -- http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
