Dan, It might be nice if we could get rid of 2curry, 3curry, 3compose, prepose eventually. For example, consider this snippet which uses 2curry twice:
[ [ dup >link where dup ] 2dip [ >r >r first r> at r> push-at ] 2curry [ 2drop ] if ] 2curry each The fry version is a lot clearer: '[ dup >link where dup [ first , at , push-at ] [ 2drop ] if ] each On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, personally, I never got used to fry. I feel comfortable using > curry and compose for most things. I don't see why it is a problem to > use them except in exceptionally complicated cases. For me, it feels > like fry is doing more than is needed. Are you suggesting that we use > > { 1 2 3 } 4 '[ , + ] map > > in place of > > { 1 2 3 } 4 [ + ] curry map > > ? I don't understand how that is much of an improvement. I'm not sure > how to do what "with" does in terms of fry. For building complicated > quotations, it's another story. It seems like both are useful. > > Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk