Hi, well the title says pretty much everything. I follow Factor since 1 1/2 year and still excited about he features and development progress.
I regularly follow the planet and browse the irc and with every incarnation it's getting better and according to blog posts faster. However, I have years of experience as a developer in large ot very large, business critical applications/systems (C, C++, C#) and we strugeld more than once with algorithms ond procedures which did not performed as expected. Agreed, most of the time it was an issue of bad design or choice of wrong methodologies but in the end "performance matters" I never waste my time with implementations which do not offer "acceptable" performance, whereas I measure performance in Computer Language Shootout ranking. (An error in it's own, btw.) I, and with the ever growing community (according to irc logs) most probably others, wonder how factor compares performance-wise in measurable, comparable values in agreed artificial on no-real world benchmarks as those seen on TCLBG. Greetings, Johann ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
