On Jun 15, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Slava Pestov wrote: > The code in $[ ... ] must not access any values from the stack. The > intention of the literals vocabulary is to pre-compute constant values > at parse-time.
Thanks Joe and Slava for the information. Sorry to have overlooked it, and it explains why I had intermittent success. On Jun 15, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Joe Groff wrote: > You should just run > « [ head ] 2each 2array » directly rather than try to use literals. Small point, but I think in my example, it should be « [ head ] 2each 3array ». In my particular use, I >AM< creating multi-dimensional array constants for later use, so I think the literal vocabulary would be appropriate. I suppose I could include more of the code that generates the two source arrays, but it does bring up the question of how to accomplish this by other means. Time to go back and re-read the vocabulary pages... Thanks again, Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
