I agree, we should prefer USING for all imports. Why does Factor still have
USE when USING is more comprehensive?
Cheers,
Andrew Pennebaker
www.yellosoft.us
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Slava Pestov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Andrew Pennebaker
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It would really be neat if you didn't have to use INCLUDE/INCLUDING for
> user
> > code and USE/USING for Factor's standard library code.
>
> Well, using vocabulary roots you can use USING: for everything. Read
> the article I linked you to, it's pretty easy to add your own
> directories to the search path.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Slava
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
> user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
> the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the
> tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the
tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
