2015-01-18 2:44 GMT+00:00 John Benediktsson <mrj...@gmail.com>:
> Also, minor comment, instead of:
>
>     length [ 0 ] { } replicate-as ;
>
> You can just do:
>
>     length 0 <array>

Thanks!

> And instead of the array-nth stuff, you can just do some type declarations
> and the compiler should make it the same as your array words:
>
>     { fixnum array } declare nth-unsafe ;
>
>     { array } declare first2-unsafe ;

Oh of course. When I wrote the code I was trying to stay stay close to
the metal and tell Factor exactly what code it should generate. Even
if it figures it out equally well on its own anyway.

> I recommend using TYPED: or TYPED:: declarations to specify neighbors is an
> array and normal sequence words?

I was trying that, but Factor appears to add dynamic type checks to
words which call typed words which increase the size of the generated
code.


-- 
mvh/best regards Björn Lindqvist

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Reply via email to