Hi Georg,
If you run it, you'll see it produces the result you would expect:
IN: scratchpad 1 2 3 4 4 narray .
{ 1 2 3 4 }
The reason it "produces a quot" is that it is implemented as a macro that
generates a quotation to do the work (in this case with a stack effect
consuming 4 items and producing 1 array).
Try this;
[ 4 narray ] expand-macros
You can also try this:
[ 4 narray ] infer
Hope that helps!
Maybe our documentation should say something about the quot, but it makes the
stack effect a little busy:
MACRO: narray ( n -- quot: ( n.. -- array ) )
> On Aug 6, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Georg Simon <georg.si...@auge.de> wrote:
>
> http://docs.factorcode.org/content/word-narray,sequences.generalizations.html
>
> Why is the stack effect ( n -- quot ) and not ( n -- array ) ?
>
> Why does the stack effect show quot as result for the following words
> nsequence, firstn, and set-firstn ?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
