Hi Alexander,
I'm not quite clear what functionality you are looking for, could you
provide a quick example?
Also, compiler.utilities isn't really a very public vocabulary so those
things might change or move around depending on what the compiler needs are.
Thanks,
John.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> When two functions (effectively) produce the same end result, I often
> prefer to use the one that is lighter on the computer resources.
>
> The following two functions are equivalent in my use case:
> map compose
> map-flat
>
> The latter one is from compiler.utilities, and it seems more complicated
> in its implementation than the former. Please, help me decide which is
> better performance- and memory-wise.
>
> ---=====---
> Александр
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> in one place.
> SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
in one place.
SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
