They are two different words. Factor uses a namespace system for lookup using vocabularies of words. If you have the need to use both accessors and models at the same time and need to call change-model you can qualify it at the call site as either accessors:change-model or models:change-model.
So, technically it's not a problem. But I can understand if it becomes an annoyance. We have a few more common change- words that can conflict with the change slot words (like change-nth in sequences). Could you elaborate on your concerns if they aren't addressed above? Thanks, > On Jun 14, 2017, at 3:25 AM, Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > Hello! > > I don't think that it's OK that we have the word `change-model` both in the > `models` and in the `accessors` vocabs. > What do you think? > > ---=====--- > Александр > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
