An experiment with using their machine infrastructure instead of the ones we've been using.
It has some drawbacks like not being able to run some of the longer time integration tests (including fully testing the binary deploy feature) we have in the code base. A full test and benchmark of all vocabularies and build snapshot and HTML documentation and upload can take an hour. We have a quick version that Travis is using right now. > On Aug 21, 2017, at 8:20 AM, Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > Cool, I'll look into it ASAP. > > What's the reason for using Travis, then? For kicks? > > 21.08.2017, 18:17, "John Benediktsson" <mrj...@gmail.com>: >> Yes, we have an entire continuous build system (you can look in >> `extra/mason`). > > ---=====--- > Александр > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
