On Sun, 1 Sep 2019, STR . wrote:
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 11:12:47
From: STR . <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Fail2ban-users] Co-existing fail2ban with custom rules
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 17:45 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
The .conf files should be considered pristine distribution files.
Don't
edit them.
I'm not, but I think I see what's going on, it's using both my custom
specified fail2ban_root and f2b-sshd chain. Here's the snipped output
of iptables-save:
[--- snipped ---]
Hello S,
You may recall that I suggested (Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:37:37) using a set
of rules, completely separate from Fail2Ban, for my purposes, so that I could
be confident that f2b rules and my rules were independent and thus were less
likely to be in conflict.
I made that suggestion having learned the hard way: it is easier for me to use my
"droplist" chain than to try to anticipate what might be done by current or
future implementations of Fail2Ban.
Yours,
--
Graham
Improving computers often helps us to make the same mistakes in less time.
<a href="http://english-1329209197.spampoison.com";>Get free spam bait here.</a>
_______________________________________________
Fail2ban-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
