On Mar 21, 2005, at 7:30 PM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
> Tom T responds: > Every description that you are using as an indicator of someone in > Unity is something that happens in the relative. Relative for you, not for them: All is one > The understanding > that I keep harping about is not in the relative. The point is the true state of UC has some extraordinary characteristics. Some of these are even observable to unawakened people. > It is beyond the > relative. It is the understanding that arises from Self knowing Self. > That understanding happened in the lively portion of the absolute. I'm not sure what "lively portion" means--that is TM lingo. To truly know what you mean it would be good to know the Sanskrit (I realize that's probably a lot to ask). This is a problem, when we learn english buzzwords divorced from their primary source. > It > has nothing to do with what one can or cannot do in the relative. Again, to someone in unity, it ain't relative, all-is-one. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
