--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (snip)
> I think the discussion has value not in statically > labeling and creating a stand-alone conceptual system, > but in a dynamic conceptual-experiential interaction. > Often I feel, akasha, that you are seeking some sort > of completely contradiction-free, coherent conceptual > system of higher states of consciousness. I see this > as impossible due to the foundational shift as > consciousness becomes increasingly aware of itself. > There is no place to "stand" to view it other than > itself. And this "itself" has no place to stand within > it! > -Peter > Not trying to be a nit-picker but shouldn't the phrase;"...as consciousness becomes increasingly aware of itself." read, "as consciousness becomes increasingly aware 'as' itself"? I think this is a very important distinction because a completely unified state will never be reached if "one" is always aware of "another". Rick Carlstrom To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
