It sounds like a good source. I use the translation of the current 
Shankaracharya of Sringiri which is excellent. He is an expert on 
Vidyaranya.

On Apr 20, 2005, at 10:54 AM, akasha_108 wrote:

>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2005, at 11:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
>>
>>> OK, so this is some guy's commentary on Patanjali.
>>
>> No, it is much more than that--it's the path to CC and UC. Patanjali 
>> is
>> part of it.
>
> Is this a reasonable translations of the Panchadasi ?
>
>
> The Panchadasi
> Sri Vidyaranya Swami
> Translated by Swami Swahananda
> Published by Sri Ramakrishna Math, Chennai
>
> Back Home.
>
> I. THE DIFFERENTIATION OF THE REAL PRINCIPLE
>
>    1. Salutation to the lotus feet of my Guru Sri Sankarananda whose
> only work is to destroy the monster of primal nescience together with
> its effect, the phenomenal universe.
>    2. This discussion about the discrimination of Truth (Brahman)
> (from untruth) is being initiated for the easy understanding of those
> whose hearts have been purified by service to the pair of lotus feet
> of the Teacher.
>    3. The objects of knowledge, viz., sound, touch, etc., which are
> perceived in the waking state, are different from each other because
> of their peculiarities; but the consciousness of these, which is
> different from them, does not differ because of its homogeneity.
>    4. Similar is the case in the dream state. Here the perceived
> objects are transient and in the waking state they seem permanent. So
> there is difference between them. But the (perceiving) consciousness
> in both the states does not differ. It is homogeneous.
>    5. A person awaking from deep sleep consciously remembers his lack
> of perception during that state. Remembrance consists of objects
> experienced earlier. It is therefore clear that even in deep sleep
> `want of knowledge' is perceived.
>    6. This consciousness (in the deep sleep state) is indeed distinct
> from the object (here, ignorance), but not from itself, as is the
> consciousness in the state of dream. Thus in all the three states the
> consciousness (being homogeneous) is the same. It is so in other days 
> too.
>    7. Through the many months, years, ages and world cycles, past and
> future, consciousness is the same; it neither rises nor sets (unlike
> the sun); it is self-revealing.
>    8. This consciousness, which is our Self, is of the nature of
> supreme bliss, for it is the object of greatest love, and love for the
> Self is seen in every man, who wishes, `May I never cease to be', `May
> I exist forever'.
>    9. Others are loved for the sake of the Self, but the Self is loved
> for none other. Therefore the love for the Self is the highest. Hence
> the Self is of the nature of the highest bliss.
>    10. In this way, it is established by reasoning that the individual
> Self is of the nature of existence, consciousness and bliss. Similar
> is the supreme Brahman. The identity of the two is taught in the
> Upanishads.
>    11. If the supreme bliss of the Self is not known, there cannot be
> the highest love for it. (But it is there). If it is known, there
> cannot be attraction for worldly objects. (That too is there). So we
> say, this blissful nature of the Self, though revealed, is not
> (strictly speaking) revealed.
>    12. A father may distinguish the voice of his son chanting (the
> Vedas) in chorus with a number of pupils but may fail to note its
> peculiarities, due to an obstruction viz., its having been mingled
> with other voices. Similar is the case with bliss. Because of
> observation, it is proper to say that the bliss `is known yet unknown'.
>    13. Our experience of the articles of everyday use is that they
> `exist', they `reveal'. Now an obstruction is that which stultifies
> this experience of existence and revelation and produces the
> counter-experience that they are not existing, they are not
>
> much more -- see link
>
>
> http://www.geocities.com/advaitavedant/panchadasi.htm
>
>
>
>
>
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Or go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!'
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to