|
My problem with akasha's specious -
it's not confusing - it's not adharmic - diatribe was that it was more than four
sentences long. Which tells me that too much time must be invested in it to make
it a reality. If it can't be explained to people little more aware than
cavemen then the result will be your bones in the pot. History proves this so.
Moreover, too much theory and
intellect is just that.
Reality is reality. Just
that.
Yada is yada. Just
that.
Like this rose petal yes, like this
stem yes? the green surface, the soft petal. It's beautiful.
Yes, beautiful...
Yada. Prove the shit.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:21
AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Doer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>
wrote:
> In my experience, it is fun to contemplate such issues. And
thank
> you to each and every one of you who contributed to this
thread.
>
> But, having noticed that even deep immersement in
these ideas over a
> period of years has not resulted in a gestalt
awakening to what is
> really happening here, I go about my business as
usual. Such
> metaphysical questions appear to get burnt up in the
searing heat of
> life lived in the present.
Well said. To
live life according to a theory that does
not correspond to one's everyday
perception strikes me
as somewhat non-productive.
We start from
where we are and work with what conscious-
ness we've got right now, here
in the present. The future,
and any subsequent states of
consciousness we find ourselves
in, will probably take care of themselves
if we do a good
enough job with the present.
That's my theory, and
I'm stickin' to it...
:-)
Unc
To subscribe, send a
message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and
click 'Join This Group!'
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
