--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Judy, I don't want to prolong this because I do understand that you > feel that if Barry just stopped acting the way you don't agree with > then you wouldn't have to point out to everyone that he's > acting/writing the way you don't agree with. > > But there is a world of difference (IMO) between Barry posting > on FFL, no matter how loose you believe he may be with a fact or > how soft his argument may be or provocative his rhetoric is, as > compared to Bush, Al Qaeda, Sai Baba, Maharishi, or Muktananda > and the level of influence and power they exercise in world affairs.
<duh> Yes, Marek. Did they always exercise this level of influence and power in world affairs? And how much influence does Barry currently exercise in the affairs of FFL? > But, to address one of your points directly, I am always > dissappointed when Barry makes a point of needling you or > criticising you gratuitously, too. "Too." I see. The knee-jerk reaction you both exhibit > regarding the other has some other underlying motivation that is, I > feel, other than what either of you state is the particular reason > you are writing about in any particular post. Sorry, but I really cannot get past the moral- equivalence problem that you have in common with Rick and several others here. It's such a gigantic blind spot that I can't take seriously anything else you say about the conflict between Barry and me.
