Well written book.
Makes ya tink a bit!

--- Bronte Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  
>   Hi, gang -
>    
>   I'm not receiving FFL emails anymore but am still
> officially signed in to this forum, and I ran across
> something today too good not to share with
> everybody. You can google this book and order it if
> you like what you read. I, for one, plan to get it.
>    
>   Best to all,
>   Bronte
>    
>    
>    
>   The Guru Papers: Masks of Authoritarian Power
> 
> by Joel Kramer and Diana Alstad
> 
> 
> [The following quotes are taken from Part One of the
> Guru Papers
> and are deemed by ex-members to be strikingly
> accurate in describing
> the dynamics of a cult guru.]
> 
> "If an authority not only expects to be obeyed
> without
> question, but either punishes or refuses to deal
> with those who
> do not, that authority is authoritarian." (p.15)
> 
> "Gurus can arouse intense emotions as there is
> extraordinary
> passion in surrendering to what one perceives as a
> living God."
> (p.33)
> 
> "In ‘spiritual’ realms fear and desire can
> become
> as extreme as they get. When a living person becomes
> the focus
> of such emotions, the possibility of manipulation is
> correspondingly
> extreme." (p.41)
> 
> "In the East a guru is more than a teacher. He is a
> doorway
> that supposedly allows one to enter into a more
> profound relationship
> with the spiritual. A necessary step becomes
> acknowledging the
> guru’s specialness and mastery over that which one
> wishes
> to attain. The message is that to be a really
> serious student,
> spiritual realization must be the primary concern.
> Therefore,
> one’s relationship with the guru must, in time,
> become one’s
> prime emotional bond, with all others viewed as
> secondary. In
> fact, typically other relationships are pejoratively
> referred
> to as ‘attachments.’" (p.49)
> 
> "So although most gurus preach detachment, disciples
> become
> attached to having the guru as their center, whereas
> the guru
> becomes attached to having the power of being
> others’ center."
> (p.50)
> 
> "The ways people deny and justify are similar: Since
> supposedly no one who is not enlightened can truly
> understand
> the motives of one who is, any criticism can be
> discounted as
> a limited perspective. Also, any behavior on the
> part of the guru,
> no matter how base, can be imputed to be some secret
> teaching
> or message that needs deciphering."
> 
> By holding gurus as perfect and thus beyond ordinary
> explanations,
> their presumed specialness can be used to justify
> anything. Some
> deeper, occult reason can always be ascribed to
> anything a guru
> does: The guru is said to take on the karma of
> others, and that
> is why his body has whatever problems it has. The
> guru is obese
> or unhealthy because he is too kind to turn down
> offerings: besides,
> he gives so much that a little excess is
> understandable. He punishes
> those who disobey him not out of anger but out of
> necessity, as
> a good father would. He uses sex to teach about
> energy and detachment.
> He lives an opulent life to break people’s
> simplistic preconceptions
> of what ego-loss should look like; it also shows how
> detached
> and unconcerned he is about what others think. For
> after all,
> ‘Once enlightened, one can do anything.’
> Believing
> this dictum makes any action justifiable.
> 
> People justify and rationalize in gurus what in
> others would
> be considered unacceptable because they have a huge
> emotional
> investment in believing their guru is both pure and
> right."
> (p.52)
> 
> "That interest in one’s own salvation is totally
> self-centered is a conundrum rarely explored."
> (p.54)
> 
> "So disciples believe they are loved
> unconditionally, even
> though this love is conditional on continued
> surrender. Disciples
> in the throes of surrender feel they have given up
> their past,
> and do not, consciously at least, fear the future. .
> . Feeling
> totally cared for and accepted, at the universe’s
> center,
> powerful, and seemingly unafraid of the future are
> all achieved
> at the price of giving one’s power to another,
> thus remaining
> essentially a child." (p56)
> 
> "It is not at all unusual to be in an authoritarian
> relationship
> and not know it. In fact, knowing it can interfere
> with surrender.
> Any of the following are strong indications of
> belonging to an
> authoritarian group:
> 
> 
> 1. No deviation from the party line is allowed.
> Anyone who has
> thoughts or feelings contrary to the accepted
> perspective is made
> to feel wrong or bad for having them.
> 
> 2. Whatever the authority does is regarded as
> perfect or right.
> Thus behaviors that would be questioned in others
> are made to
> seem different and proper.
> 
> 3. One trusts that the leader or others in the group
> know what’s
> best.
> 
> 4. It is difficult to communicate with anyone not in
> the group.
> 
> 5. One finds oneself defending actions of the leader
> (or other
> members) without having firsthand knowledge of what
> occurred.
> 
> 6. At times one is confused and fearful without
> knowing why. This
> is a sign that doubts are being repressed." (p.57)
> 
> 
> "The power of conversion experiences lies in the
> psychological
> shift from confusion to certainty." (p.65)
> 
> "People whose power is based on the surrender of
> others
> develop a repertoire of techniques for deflecting
> and undermining
> anything that questions or challenges their status,
> behavior,
> or beliefs. They ridicule or try to confuse people
> who ask challenging
> questions." (p.66)
> 
> "Is experiencing intense energy a sign of
> spirituality,
> or is the experience in the same vein as young
> ladies who swoon
> in the presence of rock stars?" (p.68)
> 
> "To be thought enlightened, one must appear not only
> certain
> that one is, but certain about most everything else,
> too."
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to