--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote:
> > 
> > Simple facts speak for themselves.
> > 
> > 
> > > It is true also that regarding the TMO and 
> > > Maharishi I prefer to see the glass half full vs half or 
entirely 
> > > empty. 
> > 
> > 
> > Again. Simple facts speak for themselves. They don't require your
> > preferences of how they should be seen. 
> > 
> 
> An interesting view. It looks kind of inside-out from here, as 
mine in 
> turn would probably look to you :-)
> 
> In mine at the moment, there appears to coexist a sea of mutually-
> contradictory "simple facts" or data among which my inner 
preference, 
> bias or "mood" automatically selects or "magnetizes" those which 
align 
> with it, to support and sustain a world "out there" in consonance 
with 
> itself.
>
Actually it *has* to be that way in our universe to support such 
diversity-- this intimate moment by moment interplay between our 
individuated forms and our surroundings; mutual selection. If not, 
growth and diversity would be truly impossible (hint hint- lol).

Reply via email to