--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > > <snip> Certainly a large percentage > > > > > > of the experiences claimed as "enlightenment" > > > > > > by Jim and Rory fall into the category of just > > > > > > some overwhelming emotion. <snip> > > > > > > > > > > Wow-- you nailed it Turq! lol > > > > > > > > *lol* You crack me up. > > > > > > Who's 'me'? > > > > An unreal spewer of non-truth. > > Who seems to get away with it in Fairfield. > What's up with that, huh?
Only in Fairfield? Show me a 'me' *anywhere* that *isn't* an unreal spewer of non-truth! (Sorry, Rory, you're just not that special in that regard.) > The best I can figure is that after decades > of empty TM promises people are so hungry > for some sign that enlightenment exists that > they'll believe almost anyone who claims to > have realized it. > > Tell me it isn't so, and that he has some > phwam! in person, cuz he really doesn't > on the Net. > > It's not an "attacking" thing on my part, > as his ego likes to believe, it's just that > I don't believe him, and he's uncomfortable > with the fact that I don't believe him. If > he weren't, and if there weren't a "he" > still in there *to* be uncomfortable, > why all these endless defenses, eh? > > Same with Jimbo. The ladies doth protest > too much, methinks. If all you're looking for is stupid human shakti tricks, then Rory is probably not the one to seek out for a fix. But, he's definitely a good one to seek out if you want to chat outside Revelations and watch the hot babes with cute puppies.
