Self prior to all distinction? Doesn't that necessarily turn out to be a verbal quibble? To know itself as Self, doesn't it have to posit a non-self?
Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > R: This simile still implies that the "oil-slick" and the "ocean" are > > in > > > > someway different though, and that's not true. > > > > > > That well explains why some are so eternally slippery. "Braman is slippery" -- MMY said it, too, so it must be true :-) Seriously (more or less), what do you expect of "something" that is subtler than either-or, a priori to language? How many here understand that the Self is prior to discrimination? Mmm? ... Almost everybody. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com