Personally, I think you two gals should suck Delia into this discussion. Then *three* of you could play "my dick is longer than yours."
:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually, Judy, any idiot can determine which names in a bibliography are the most "authoritative." Pick up ten books on the same subject, check out the bibliography, and note which names are repeated, which names are quoted by everyone who thinks he's got something to say on a given subject. > > And what would it do for you if I named five or six European historians. Would you then know that I told the truth? I don't think so. > > authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander > <mailander111@> wrote: > > > > And what would such a list do for you, or for my credibility, > > since any idiot can copy someone else's bibliography? > > But not any idiot would know which names from > that bibliography are the most authoritative. > > > authfriend <jstein@> wrote: > <snip> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander > > <mailander111@> wrote: > > > > > > My bibliography is about twenty-five pages. How much of it > > > do you want? > > > > Oh, let's say five of those you consider the most > > authoritative. > > > > > authfriend <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander > > > <mailander111@> wrote: > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > A third war was planned all along, according to European > > > > historians. > > > > > > Which historians were these, Angela? > > > > > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com >
