--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 11, 2007, at 3:10 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > What a load of self-important garbage. The only > > thing that could "destroy science" is bad science, > > done with questionable motives and even more > > questionable intent, for the purpose of making > > money or shaping public opinion. Like tobacco > > research paid for by the tobacco industry. Or > > TM research paid for by the TMO. > > > Recent research has actually shown that the vast majority of TM > "research" is not scientific or at best "bad science".>>
And as I asked you before, in which respected peer-reviewed sceintific journal does this appear? Your anti-science people are insane. This is like the republican science claims about evolution and naoh's ark. Santa Claus is more credible than unpublished research Vaj. Let us know when you have a published study...then tell us when you have 40-50. Like I said, even one quarter of the amount on TM and I will take it seriously. This shows my complete open-mindedness and you and Turq and Steven's absolute fanatical and destructive attitude to science. A million studies would not convince you, yet it only takes about 40-50 to change my mind. OffWorld
