--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > My opinion is to wonder why you -- and most Americans -- > > > believe that you NEED a storage tank to have hot water. > > > > Well, actually, they don't believe this. > > > > Doesn't Barry know how to look up *anything*? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demand_water_heater > > > > http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/home/appliances/waterheaters.html > > http://tinyurl.com/2y2yar > > > > <snip> > > > EVERYWHERE in Europe they use these "on demand" hot water > > > heaters, and they work just great, and they save a shitload > > > of energy. > > > > > > So WHY have Americans not figured this out? > > > > As with practically everything Barry chooses to > > preach to us about, things are not quite so simple > > as he would like us to believe. > > > > In some cases, tankless heaters save energy. In > > others, they don't. See the two URLs above for > > advantages and disadvantages of tankless heaters, > > including energy use. > > > Look, Judy...here's the thing. > > You are what you are -- old, obsessed, unhappy, and insane. > > ( In my opinion, of course. ) > > I do not expect you to change. In fact, I expect *nothing* > about your life to change, ever. I expect you to die JUST as > obsessed and JUST as insane and JUST as unhappy as you are > now...just a little older, that's all. > > No matter *what* I do, you will continue to obsess on me, > as you are clearly doing here. > > You have been doing it for over fourteen years, and as far > as I can tell nothing is going to stop that obsessing now. > > You like to pretend that it's *not* obsessing, and that you > are somehow "protecting" the fully-grown adults of FFL from > my misstatements and lies and evil intent. That's how you've > excused what you do for many, many years now. > > Ignoring the issue of whether the fully-grown adults of FFL > NEED "protecting" from me :-), I'm just gonna point out a > *different* way of looking at your actions -- as obsession, > and as not a particularly healthy one. > > I mean, think about it. EVERYONE here has heard you rave > about how you've "gotten Barry" with some nitpick or repost of > something I've said. They've 'heard' the maniacal glee in your > screen 'voice' as you claim to have "gotten Barry." And they've > watched you do this several times a week for a couple of years > now here on FFL, and in some cases for much longer back on a.m.t. > There have been weeks in which easily half of your output to > this forum has consisted of attempts to "get Barry." > > Does this strike you as a SANE thing for a supposedly intelli- > gent 67-year-old-woman to be doing, as seemingly her greatest > source of pleasure? ( It is certainly your most *consistent* > source of pleasure on this group. ) > > You obviously believe that thinking and acting this way is > somehow excusable, even laudable. Me, I think it's insane. I'm > willing to bet that more people on this forum agree with me > than agree with you. > > So my approach is to go back to allowing you to try to "get > Barry" all you want. You'll continue to try to goad me into > one-on-one confrontations with you over nitpicks and issues > that mean nothing to anyone except yourself. > > And me, I'll just ignore them and continue to point out that > the fact THAT you keep trying to "get Barry" is evidence of a > Class-A obsession, one that at this point has probably > crossed the border from mere dislike to insanity. > > And then we'll just let the bystanders decide. > > Have a nice day, Judy. > > Me, in a couple of hours I'll be having dinner with some friends > here in Sitges, and then we're all going to don costumes and go > out dancing and partying until the wee hours of the morning. > > Meanwhile, you'll be sitting in front of your computer monitor, > trying to figure out the ultimate way to respond to this post > so that you can "get Barry" again. And when you find it and post > that ultimate scathing reply, you'll *still* be sitting there > in front of that same monitor, waiting to see how I respond, > and how well you "got Barry" this time. > > And I won't respond. I'll be off dancing. > > I *know* that in your mind you've found a way to believe that > you have "won" EVERY interaction between us, for over 14 years > now. And you'll find a way to believe that you've "won" this > one, too. > > But I'll be off dancing with pretty girls, and you'll be sitting > there alone, staring at a computer monitor, waiting for me to > reply so that you can start "getting Barry" again. > > If you think that's "winning," I feel very sorry for you.
If Judy bothers you so much why do you keep up with your responses? Seems you're going bonkers. Why? What's your problem?
