---The ME: still, no demonstrable Siddhis.

 In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> When John Findlay visited M.I.U. in 1980, he endorsed the ME (there 
is a vidoetape of this in the MUM library).  As a fellow of both the 
British Academy and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and as 
Clark Professor of Metaphysics at Yale, Findlay arguably was the 
leading philosopher of mysticism in the 20th Century:  in his Gifford 
Lectures of 1965-67 he offers a brilliant defense of reincarnation as 
well as higher states of consciousness.      John Niemeyer Findlay 
(1903-1987) was one of the twentieth century's most unique 
philosophers. At a time when positivism, scientific materialism, 
linguistic analysis, and ordinary language philosophy were the 
academic staple in Britain and America, Findlay championed 
phenomenology, revived Hegelianism, and wrote works that were 
inspired by Plotinus, Buddhism, and Absolute Idealism. In the course 
of a long career that brought him to universities in South Africa and 
New Zealand, to Kings College in London, Yale, the University
>  of Texas at Austin, and Boston University, Findlay made major 
contributions to the study of Meinong, Husserl (he translated both 
volumes of the Logical Investigations into English), Hegel, Plato, 
Wittgenstein and Kant. His 1958 work, Hegel: A Reexamination, was 
instrumental in reviving the interest in Hegel in the English-
speaking world. His highly original rational-mystical philosophy is 
detailed in four of his books, The Discipline of the Cave, The 
Transcendence of the Cave, Values and Intentions and Ascent to the 
Absolute. Findlay's command of the history of both western and 
eastern thought was legendary. John Silber once commented that "if 
all the philosophical libraries in the world were suddenly lost, 
Findlay could come closer to recapturing the history of  
philosophical and religious thought, both West and East, than any 
other person."
>    
>   Sanford Drob, M.D., Ph.D.
> 
> Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>                   From: David Orme-Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 12:08 PM
> To: David Orme-Johnson
> Subject: Rationale for the Maharishi Effect
> 
> 
>   
>   Dear Colleagues,
>   
>   The rationale for the Maharishi Effect, which holds that we exist 
in a field of consciousness through which everyone is connected, is a 
very old idea with a high pedigree. Even more exciting is that the 
modern seers who know natural law the best, the greatest physicists 
of our time, have been lead by their discoveries to the realization 
that consciousness is the most fundamental level of natural law. 
>   
>   I just added a rationale section to TruthAboutTM.com, snappily 
entitled "Some Conceptual Precedents for a Field Theoretic View of 
Consciousness from the Perennial Philosophy, Social Sciences, and 
Quantum Physics."
>   
>   You can go to the link above to view the whole thing, and/or here 
are some excerpts. 
>   
>   Perennial Philosophy. The suggestion that individuals interact 
directly at a distance through an underlying common field of 
consciousness has a long history. Indeed, it is embedded in 
the "perennial philosophy," the term Aldous Huxley (1945) first 
applied to the universal system of thought that has persisted 
throughout history in all parts of the world and which continues to 
be seriously discussed by major thinkers, as documented by Sheer 
(1994). The key tenets of the perennial philosophy can be stated as: 
(1) the phenomenal world is a manifestation of an unmanifest 
transcendental ground, a field of consciousness or Being, which is 
the infinite organizing power structuring all forms and phenomena in 
the universe; (2) the human mind also has a transcendental ground, 
which is the silent level of transcendental consciousness at the 
basis of all thought and perception; (3) transcendental consciousness 
is the direct experience by the individual of the transcendental 
ground of
>  the universe; and (4), this experience organizes individual and 
collective life to be fully evolutionary, creative, harmonious, and 
problem-free. From this perspective, the key to creating an ideal 
society is a technology that promotes transcending from the waking 
state mind to experience transcendental consciousness (Maharishi, 
1977). The physiological correlates of transcendental consciousness 
through Maharishi's Transcendental Meditation technique have been 
extensively studied (e.g., Wallace, 1970; Travis & Pearson, 1999; 
Travis, Tecce, Arenander, & Wallace, 2002).
>   
>   The transcendental ground of the universe is conceived of in 
terms of a God concept in many cultures. In others, like Taoism and 
Vedanta, it is simply regarded as an abstract field of pure 
consciousness.
>   
>   Social Sciences. Concepts of collective consciousness have been 
proposed by some of the founders of the social sciences, such as 
Fechner's transcendental basis of perception, Durkheim's conscience 
collective, and Jung's collective unconscious. 
>   
>   Gustav Fechner is best known for developing methods of measuring 
sensory thresholds, which are the least amounts of energy that the 
senses can detect. What motivated his studies of thresholds was his 
experience of a single transcendental continuum of "general 
consciousness" underlying the discontinuities of numerous localized 
individual minds associated with different people. He illustrated the 
idea with a model in which individual minds were likened to separate 
islands in the water. But if the level of the water were lowered 
sufficiently, the "islands" would be seen to actually be mountains 
that are connected at their base by the ground. Like that, if the 
perceptual threshold were insensitive, as is usually the case, then 
each individual mind would experience itself as isolated from other 
minds. But if the sensory threshold were sufficiently refined, 
Fechner believed, the individual would experience the continuity of 
consciousness at the basis of all minds. Fechner felt
>  that such a lowering of the sensory threshold was what happened to 
him when he himself had a direct experience of what he called the 
general consciousness.
>   
>   Physics. Many of the founders of modern physics have expressed 
their insights that, like the perennial philosophy, the ultimate 
reality is a field of consciousness. Although the remarks of great 
scientists are not formally a part of science, it is significant that 
those who understand the scientific paradigm most clearly have made 
such statements. For example, Sir James Jeans (1932), the eminent 
British physicist and mathematician who was the first to propose that 
matter is continuously created throughout the universe, said: "Thirty 
years ago, we thought, or assumed that we were heading towards an 
ultimate reality of a mechanical kind ....  Into this wholly 
mechanical world .... life had stumbled by accident .... Today there 
is a wide measure of agreement, which on the physical side of science 
approaches almost unanimously, that the stream of knowledge is 
heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look 
more like a great thought than a great machine.
>  Mind no longer appears as an accidental intruder into the realm of 
matter; we are beginning to suspect that we ought rather to hail it 
as the creator and governor of the realm of matter—not of course our 
individual minds, but the mind in which the atoms of which our 
individual minds have grown exist....." (pp. 185-186).
>   
>   All the best,
>   David
>   
>   
>   David W. Orme-Johnson, Ph.D.
> 
> 
> 
>       Recent Activity
>     
>       3
>   New Members
> 
> Visit Your Group 
>       Search Ads
>   Get new customers.
>   List your web site
>   in Yahoo! Search.
> 
>     Yahoo! Groups
>   Cat Zone
>   Connect w/ others
>   who love cats.
> 
>     How-To Zone
>   on Yahoo! Groups
>   Find garden, home
>   & auto groups.
> 
> 
> 
>   .
> 
>  
>                          
> 
>        
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  
Try it now.
>


Reply via email to