--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <geezerfreak@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I see...so you were just being a dick again Off> > > > > > > > > No, that would be you Curtis because only talentless people > > criticize > > > > non-profit innocent work. No-one with talent would do that. It is > > one > > > > thing to criticize professional work, but to act like an art- > > critic for > > > > simple expressions is just the sign of a complete has-been > > wannabe > > > > artist (by the way, when it comes to visual arts I am light years > > ahead > > > > of you guitar boy - I make about $60,000 a year out of it) > > > > > > > > OffWorld > > > > > > > Still with "Off" on this one Judith? Just checking. > > > > Are you perhaps imagining something here, geeze? > > > > This is you 2 hours ago: > > Judy: I have to agree with off_world on this. The guy > obviously put a lot of work and feeling into > the video. I didn't like the star fades either, > but they didn't get that much in the way of > enjoying this remarkable collection of photos. > > If the fades irritated you so much that you just > couldn't keep yourself from remarking on them, > there are lots of ways you could have done so > without seeming to mock the fellow.
Right. And what exactly do you see in the post of mine you quote and in Off's current post that causes you to imagine I'd be with him on it? Did I say Curtis was a has-been, or talentless?
